Sunday, November 21, 2010

Take Home Test: Emerging Christian Traditions


The Basilica Ulpia is a large rectangular building with a large interior consisting of a central nave flanked by double colonnaded aisles and two apses, or rounded extensions at the two ends of the building.  The upper nave wall had windows called clerestory windows. These allowed light to flood into the interior.  The building was used for Roman governmental purposes (a court of law) and also a public meeting place inside Trajan’s forum.  From most of the references I came across, the upper clerestory consisted of the Ionic order columns while the lower aisles were made with Corinthian order columns, the favorite order of columns in Rome.  Both of these orders of columns have been taken from Greek architectural traditions, referencing the ancient Greek temples.  Romans were notorious for copying and adopting Greek traditions because of the glory of cities like Athens and the political, mythological, and even philosophical similarities/adoptions (they greatly respected classical Rome).  The clerestory windows actually date all the way back to the ancient Egyptians, another society highly regarded for their success/progress.  Clerestory windows are seen at Khafre’s funerary complex in an adjacent valley temple and allow light to shine in and reflect of the polished alabaster floor. It should be noted that Romans did undergo a faze of Egyptomania (whether or not this is why clerestory windows have been used in the Basilica Ulpia is besides the point).  This just shows that the Romans did adopt architectural traditions from Egypt for various reasons, some political (they did take control of Egypt at one time). In all, the Basilica Ulpia is a fine example of architecture common in classical Rome.
 

Old St. Peter’s was constructed by Constantine, the first Christian emperor of Rome.  The church is a longitudinally planned building just like any other basilica.  This was basically the starting point for what would define a Christian basilica.  The narthex is a region across the width of the building and the space is for those not yet baptized.  There were five long sections created which can be seen from the frontal view of the building.  Each had doorways, one large serving as the entrance to the nave (area for the congregation) and two smaller doorways on either side also giving access to the church.  The columns lining the nave supported an entablature, an upper horizontal section common to classical buildings (usually consisting of the architrave, frieze, and cornice.) Double-sided aisles have also been created by another set of columns running parallel to the nave colonnade.  Many of these columns were Corinthian order and may have actually been spoila (from the Latin word spoil, which means they were reused) from the circus of Nero.  These columns parallel to the nave colonnade supported round arches, which supported windows above.  The roofs were supported by wooden rafters.  Constantine also deviated from the traditional basilica and formed a perpendicular hall in front of the “frontal” apse.  This provided extra space for clergy and other needs.  The entire longitudinal plan basically directs people along that axis through the narthex and through the nave until they reach the altar at the terminating apse (it have two apses). It is not stated in our class text, but other sources and images confirm that the church was also lit by clerestory windows high above the ground floor.  These windows let in a heavenly light that would have enhanced the spiritual experience for those attending.  It may have been obvious to some, but I’m sure the way the light flooded in illuminating the surrounding area would have been very amazing and awe inspiring, especially in a building that could hold at least 14,000 worshippers.  The scale of the church must (have) affected the people greatly and connected them to God.   


The two buildings are obviously connected by their shared architectural style.  It can be seen that Old St. Peter’s is almost directly based off of Roman basilicas like the Basilica Ulpia.  However, the architecture is only a surface connection between the two structures.  More important is the cultures involved and the shift in religious thinking that accompanies Roman basilicas and early churches like Old St. Peter’s.  The basilica comes from the Romans whose religion was considered to be pagan by the Christian Church.  The Church adopts this “pagan” architecture because the very people who convert to Christianity are Romans.  Constantine issued the Edict of Milan granting freedom of worship, but in reality he embraced Christianity as the proper state religion.  He built Old St. Peter’s in the Roman style basically because that’s how he knew to build things.  This should remind us of the basic idea that Christianity rose up out of a non-Christian society, so these characteristics being carried over should be expected, just as those non-believers had been carried over into new faith.  It should be noted that while judges spoke from the apses of the Basilica Ulpia, Christian clergy spoke from what we can assume were elevated altars situated in the apse of Old St. Peter’s.  This is just one example of what Constantine would have seen as obviously similar functional needs of both buildings (I’m sure many agreed that Christianity could redeem “pagan” styles as long as they were used for Christ.)  This is why the basilica is chosen for the new church spaces. Another huge fact to consider is that the church is built overtop of the circus of Nero, a Roman emperor known for his persecution of Christians.  The circus was the first site of state-sponsored executions of Christians such as Peter.  Constantine greatly dishonors Nero’s legacy by building on top of the circus of Nero and even taking pieces of the structure to build his church.  But he greatly honors St. Peter as a martyr, by building a church on the site of past state sponsored persecutions and over top of St. Peter’s burial site. St. Peter’s tomb is understood to be underneath the apse of the church.  This confirms even more how Roman society was shifting into a Christian tradition.  Also, Constantine added a perpendicular region in front of the “frontal” apse.  He may not have known it at the time, but this region would be extended until the overall shape of the building was a cross.  Soon, the word basilica would even become an ecclesiastical term, not just an architectural term.  This is exactly why I think the two examples, Basilica Ulpia and Old St. Peter’s, epitomize the connections and transition from a classical Rome to a Rome characterized by its emerging Christian traditions.

Monday, November 1, 2010

Psykter, ca.520-510 B.C.; Attributed to Oltos




This red-figure psykter is attributed to Oltos for the type of bearded trainer depicted, wearing a mantle with radiating folds, zigzag edges, and hair regularly incised with a wavy line.  The scene depicts these trainers with athletes practicing in a gymnasium.  The figures are skillfully adjusted to the curving of the psykter.  Psykters were used as wine coolers made to float in a krater filled with chilled water.  The psykter has a bulging form and the bottom of the pot is extended in order to keep it from tipping as it floated. (It was exclusively used in male drinking parties called symposia)

Monday, October 18, 2010

"Peplos" Kore

   
    The “Peplos” Kore is a statue created before the Persian invasion.  I found this statue very interesting along with others like it because of the history surrounding them.  This statue is fairly static much like the Berlin Kore.  It does depict a somewhat more realistic or naturalistic representation of a person, but it is still archaic looking.  The style in which this statue was made is very connected to the interaction of cultures at this time. The person has patterned hair and a smile (the archaic smile) that are very much related to middle eastern styles. This region was not far from the Greek city states and was fairly integrated into "Greek" society through trade.  What is more interesting is that this artistic tradition would end with the Persian invasion of Athens, and a new completely naturalistic (although idealized) artistic tradition would begin.  Pericles began this renewal even though earlier leaders had vowed to never rebuild.  They decided to bury the defaced city monuments, like the “Peplos” Kore, as if they were real people.  You can see that the Persians ripped the arm from the statue, because they too viewed the statues and symbols for real people.  After this event, the archaic smile and patterned hair were no longer incorporated into Athenian styles.  Instead the new style celebrated the human and the capability of man, and was a response to Persian 'barbarism'.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

Individual Blog Part 2

This artists name is Susanna Shap and she creates contemporary modern paintings.  She says that contemporary modern art can come in different styles and that the focus is either on color or design.  She focuses first on the composition, the heavy texture.  The color is the second thing she adds.  She enjoys modern and abstract art mostly for the freeing nature of the art and not having to worry about whether anyone else likes it.  She creates her textured abstract paintings with a palette knife using oils, acrylics, and anything else the paintings might need.  In response to textured art being just “globs of paint”, she says that she “feels there can never bee too much texture, even if in globs…so long as it is done right and does no come out looking amateur and sloppy.  She explains that there is a lot of control that goes into her pieces that has come with time, experience, and experimentation.  Since, each painting is one of a kind original and each palette knife stroke is done by hand, no piece is ever exactly the same.  This just goes to show that her creative process is fluid even though it can look very repetitive.  I think her paintings are very “wall worthy” for the house I don’t have yet. They all look “good”, the repetitive flow of texture and vibrant colors, even the sameness in tone of each single painting works to the advantage of each piece.  Do you like them?


Friday, October 1, 2010

Downtown Presbyterian Church















The Downtown Presbyterian Church was a good example of converging cultures in architecture, something discussed in my visual communications class. The Church is designed after ancient Egypt artistic conventions, which were revisited during an Egyptian revival period. This Church mixes strong Egyptian influences with Christian ideas. Crosses are shaped in a way to fit with the Egyptian style. The logo printed on the bibles also has an ancient hieroglyphic-like feeling. However, the pillars with papyrus depictions and the geometric patterns used throughout the Church are very Egypt specific, with no Christian influence. Egyptomania spread throughout much of the art world at this time, but many still thought the use of these aesthetics in a Christian world was offensive because of their cultural implications (design elements can become attached to a entire people and their way of living)





Personally, I would never have guessed the two styles would have been mixed so deliberately. I would like to understand more of the images in the Church such as the large "God" hieroglyphic. I'm sure there is someone who could have explained the image to me, and I would still like to know how it is interpreted in that christian church.  The rest of the Egyptian elements, pillars and patterns were quite aesthetically pleasing.  The pillars were painted with vibrant colors and rose to the ceiling, dwarfing those standing nearby.  They created a rhythm that continued around the room with impressions of pillars on the walls.  The symmetry created with two groupings of three pillars towards the front guides your eyes towards a central point (the organ during worship or the speaker during a message). The ceiling was also intensely decorated with ornate crown molding like pieces that may have actually been more in style of European churches.  Ornate decoration was popular earlier in Europe and during the time of this church's construction. One of the characteristics I really liked was the openness of the Church. This along with sky blue ceilings really created an amazing lofty effect, which I'm sure was intentional and adds to the spiritual space.  Also, pillars were painted behind the actual pillars which added depth to this part of the church.  The area seemed to have normal lighting, but did have stained glass windows (commonly found in churches) with an Egyptian spin which cast a jewel-like glow.  The positioning of the church right inside a city (next to modern skyscrapers) just made me think that it would be "old" maybe even dark and dull, but I was very surprised with how bright and interesting the church ended up being. My group and I briefly discussed some of these elements. We agreed that the Church was unlike most churches we had seen before and that the experience was very worth while.

Friday, September 17, 2010

A Hunt for Hightech - Bart Hess

http://we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2008/04/-found-little-info-about.php


     The article is actually an interview with artist Bart Hess about his project A Hunt for Hightech.  His images show mutant skins, breathing shoes, and living furs.  Bart Hess worked to find new materials forecasting trends in fashion and culture.  Hess explained that he did not try to mimic real animal kingdoms but "create a fantasy world of [his] own."   He imagined fantasy animals, ones that could be genetically manipulated.  His ideas led to part robotic, part organic animal-like creations.  Hess uses materials that are not commonly seen in the fashion world such as blended plastics, metallic's, silicon's and technical foils.  Prosthetic technology and genetic manipulation inspired Hess to create this fantasy animal kingdom, future human shapes, and new body forms.  He says that his work "is blindly discovering a low-tech prosthetic way for human enhancement.

     At first, Hess's art is sort of creepy. But after viewing more of his work on his blog, I was able to at least understand part of his process for coming up with wacky but interesting creations.  It seems that you are able to group the suit-like pieces into categories. I like the fact that each piece is not completely random but instead many are simple variations of one idea. (The best way to describe this is grouping the art into adjective categories; bubbly, rolly, foamy, and jagged)  His work isn't too crazy for me after seeing the similarities.  Also, his colors and texture are sort of fun, and mostly all the pieces are visually pleasing (as opposed to a lot of completely random ugly contemporary art).





          

Bart Hess hopes to impact trends in fashion, product, or architecture with his work. He has some far out ideas about where technology could take his creations.  He says "Why kill an animal and re-form the fur into a shape? Why not have the animal already shaped to your body, have it living and breathing around you, like the shoes."  Obviously today's technology and ethical environments do not allow these extreme fantasies to become reality.  And it is probably unlikely that live animals for clothes will catch on in the fashion world.